Can Transit Oriented Development be effective in Urban India?
The concept of Transit-Oriented
Development (TOD) as a planning tool is new to Indian cities, where quality
mass rapid transit systems (MRTS) are a recent development. The idea of TOD has
emerged due to the steep rise of congestion and poor air quality due to rapid
urban development experienced in the last decade. Delhi, in particular, is
looking to TOD as a solution to its mobility and air quality issues. The city
recently prepared a TOD policy document that it will apply around Delhi Metro
stations. TOD is being championed by UTTIPEC (Delhi Development Authority) as a solution to congestion, environment quality and housing equity. Global
sustainability proponents are also encouraging TOD as a tool to achieve greater
sustainability in the developing world, avoiding the costly mistakes of cities
in industrialized West. TOD seems to be a win-win solution for local concerns
and global sustainability. Can this concept, developed for the auto-dominated
North American city, be universal enough to be applied in urban India?
The primary goal of TOD is to shift
an auto-centric realm of urban living to a transit-centric realm of urban
living. The main indicator of a city’s auto or transit orientation is the mode
share – the proportion of daily trips being made by private vehicle transportation
versus other public or non-motorized transport (NMT) means. If private vehicular
modes of transportation constitute a major share of trips, TOD interventions aim
to significantly shift the mode share.
The TOD guidelines for Delhi indicate a desire to achieve a 70-30 modal share
(public-private) in favor of public transportation by 2021[1]. How does the mode share of Indian
cities compare with other cities around the world? Do Indian cities have
significant numbers private vehicle trips to easily shift to mass transit?
A 2011 comparison study in the
journal Journeys[2]
of the mode share in select global
cities with over a million residents included Ahmadabad, Bangalore, Delhi and
Mumbai. The study indicated the Indian metros except Ahmadabad have 25% or less
mode share for private transport.
Only Tokyo (comparable in land area and population to Mumbai & Delhi), had
a lower private transportation share at 12%. Going by the Journal’s report,
Delhi already has a desirable mode share
with only 19% of private transport trips. In addition, the Delhi metro
ridership is at an all-time high at 2.4 million passengers a day[3].
So can a TOD policy focused around Metro stations be effective in shifting the
mode-share from cars to transit? Or will intensification add to the congestion?
This comparison indicates that Indian
metros need to contextualize their TOD policies, if they aim to move automobile
commuters to public transit. Looking at Indian cities, the potential for
significant mode share shift would be
in Ahmadabad (42% private transport) and Bangalore (25% private transport). TOD
strategies in Delhi and Mumbai would need to focus on making existing
localities more amiable to non-motorized travel, and; focusing TOD strategies
judiciously along transit corridors, by understanding travel relationships
between trip originations and destinations.
To be effective, TOD policy formation
should begin with setting quantifiable benchmarks that best represent the
objectives and goals of the city. While shifting the mode share is a prominent TOD benchmark, other benchmarks should
also be considered, especially for Mumbai and Delhi, where the mode share already is quite favorable. Benchmarks
that quantify the following strategies can be utilized to measure the success
of TOD policies:
·
Matching land
use capacity along transit corridors to the MRTS capacity – This approach would be most effective for cities where a
singular Mass transit system is being utilized for a TOD strategy. This will
help create an optimum density along the corridor, and avoid congestion that
may arise due to over intensification along the corridor.
·
Identifying
existing transit rich areas
–Existing neighborhoods with high public transit density should be candidates
for TOD strategies to match the transit capacity. Transit stations areas that
have multiple modes of transit such as regional rail or BRT could have much
higher densities beyond what would have been dictated by the previous
benchmark.
·
Setting land
use mix goals for neighborhoods and districts – A diverse mix of land uses is the cornerstone for
pedestrian and transit-oriented community. A benchmark for a desirable use mix
would measure existing transit supported single use neighborhoods changing over
time and attain the desired mix without necessarily intensifying beyond an
optimal density.
·
Setting
benchmarks for increasing cycle/rickshaw infrastructure – Rather than focusing on a private to public travel
mode-shift, settings goals for increasing NMT modes could be more effective in
changing travel habits. It has been evident in many cities, where proper
investments are made in pedestrian/bicycle infrastructure, more people use it.
Bogota, Copenhagen, Portland, Curitiba are prime examples of this.
·
Identifying TOD
ready areas – Old, resettlement and traditional
neighborhoods may already have ‘good bones’ for becoming a TOD with good street
connectivity, use-mix and density. By adding transit connectivity, and minimal
infrastructure interventions, they could become transit-oriented.
·
Setting a
benchmark for affordability along the corridor – One of the goals set by DDA’s TOD policy is housing for all [4]
by mandating affordable housing be part of any new project within the TOD zone.
Affordability in urban metros should include the cost of housing and
transportation. If redevelopment of existing slums is part of a TOD project,
the resettlement should account for both the cost of housing and transportation
from the new housing to the existing job centers of the displaced residents. If
the cost rises beyond an established benchmark, alternatives should be
considered.
These
strategies, though not comprehensive, are crucial for making TOD successful in
urban India. Setting benchmarks for these contextual strategies will provide
targets that city planners and administrators can aim for by appraising policies,
strategies and projects periodically to ensure the city is transforming from being auto-dominated to a more equitable multi-modal oriented environment.
Note:
- A more generalized version of this blog is posted at theCityFix.com - here
- The Institute for Transportation & Development Policy(ITDP) has recently published a set of TOD standards that provide key metrics for creative good TOD projects. These metrics could be a good starting point for customizing Indian TOD strategy benchmarks.
[1]
UTTIPEC (2012). Transit Oriented Development – Policy, Norms, Guidelines pp. 3
[2]
LTA Academy (2011). Passenger Transport Mode Shares in World Cities. Journeys,
Issue 7 pp. 60-71. Website: http://ltaacademy.gov.sg/doc/JOURNEYS_Nov2011%20Revised.pdf
[3]
The Economic Times (August 10, 2013). Delhi Metro sets ridership record with
over 25 lakh commuters. Website: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-08-10/news/41268141_1_ridership-record-delhi-metro-thursday
[4]
UTTIPEC (2012). Transit Oriented Development – Policy, Norms, Guidelines pp. 3
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete